|
If you have any reason to doubt Barack Obama's sincerity, read this book. I highly recommend this book.
It inspires you as a person and truly displays the value of politics, particularly at a time when politics seems useless to many people. The Audacity of Hope is a really great book.
It is even more inspiring to consider that hard work, determination, and an eagerness to work with (and for) others can land a humble American into the oval office. It is also rewarding to get inside the president's head and see that he really is just like all of us and he truly cares.
As a certified nurse aide, a job that requires a person to be sincerely empathetic, it is refreshing for me to read the words of a man who understands empathy better than many people. It should be read by any politically-engaged American.
If you are like me (a liberal democrat), you will probably be biased to like the book anyway, but it's nice to know more about the guy we voted for, right.
Since commercial publishers have historically shown little interest in Peace Corps Volunteer's literature, ninety percent of these books are self-published. This would include published memoirs, letters, essays, novels, short stories and poetry inspired by service. As the fiftieth anniversary of the Peace Corps' inception approaches, let us correct this.As you know, hundreds of thousands of Americans have heard the call and hundreds have returned to fulfill that pledge to share their experience through literature. Most wise leaders are remembered for supporting the arts and learning.
The Library of Congress has a great set of special collections, several of which include twentieth century work. The books will be donated. Tragically, even the Peace Corps Resource Library in Washington D.C. The Kennedy Library only accepts original material. President:As a Returned Peace Corps Volunteer (Honduras, 1975-1977), I request your help to create a new Special Collection at the Library of Congress, the Peace Corps Experience Collection.
During the second half of the twentieth century, only N.A.S.A. and the Peace Corps have been equally popular. caught America's imagination. does not keep published work written by its own volunteers, the salt of the earth. The Library of Congress currently will not accept any book unless at least 500 copies were printed.
During the first half of the twentieth century only the W.P.A. Dear Mr. Yet, like the W.P.A. and the C.C.C., first-hand experience books about the Peace Corps are hard to find and our collective memory fades.
There is even a collection of "Amateur Publications" by early twentieth century journalists. The addition Peace Corps literature will serve our nation well at no cost to the tax payer. This is an opportunity for President Obama.
By creating such a repository, the Library of Congress would become a historical guardian for the Peace Corps' collective memory and promote understanding (the Peace Corps' third goal).Currently, there is no such treasure. The fiftieth anniversary is the perfect time to announce the creation of a Peace Corps Experience Collection within the Library of Congress. In today's Print-On-Demand publishing world, this excludes almost all Peace Corps' books.Popular government sponsored programs are rare.
and the C.C.C. Web sites related to the Peace Corps are numerous. Thanking you in advance for your kind consideration,
The second work by Barack Obama shows how the politician has matured, but is still learning and developing his ideals and strategies. As is typical of the book, this chapter is not a systematic analysis of Obama's views on race. There is a lot that British politicians and activists on racial issues can learn from that.This is a very honest account of how Obama, before he took over the office of the President, experienced and understood how the political system in the USA works. For instance, The World beyond Our Borders has more emphasis on certain parts of the world such as Indonesia and Vietnam, rather than others. The first few chapters contain descriptions and observations that begin to give a voter, in any democratic country in the world, an insight into how the system is operated for the interests of a few, supported by the majority. On the other hand the chapters that deal with issues such as values are thought provoking. It is as well written as the first book, Dreams of My Father, and is difficult to put down, although it is clearly aimed at American citizens and is, therefore, not always as interesting for non-American readers.There is some imbalance in the book. But it is even more significant because he analyses where and why debates on multicultural issues are where they are.
Despite the shortcomings, I rate this as a 5 star book because it has the potential to be a great asset to readers. The chapter on race is particularly interesting to the reviewer who is from a diverse background, and is conscious of the debates in Britain about issues of race and culture. In many ways it reminds us of The Prince, by Machiavelli. One can read about how the media is a great manipulator, how political parties can become rigid and almost autocratic, and how politicians make decisions about how to vote, not in a chamber for debates, but behind the scenes.Some writer can make a study guide for a democratic political system out of this book.
Now that I've finished the book, I believe the goal was right. Everyone loves hearing stories about other people's lives. I was party right and party wrong. Before I read the book, I thought the book The Audacity of Hope by Barack Obama was basically a very well written advertisement for Barack Obama. He's smooth, passionate, and honest. The personal stories were the most interesting parts of the book.
Despite that, the book was an interesting read.Overall, there were good points and bad points in the book.
however, the intended audience isn't the average American.
If the purpose of the book was to communicate Obama's hopes for the future, the details of politics dindn't seem entirely relevant, except to give background information.The sections about what can be done to improve America was quite average, and seemed reused.
I thought its sole purpose was to portray him as 'the good guy' and appeal to the average American's values, and boost his popularity within the political world of America.
Maybe because its the gossiper in everyone at work.The political sections of the book were boring, and didn't add much value.
Some of the political detail he talks about is beyond the grasp of the average American.
'Left Wing', 'Right Wing', Democrats, and their expected baviours.
But Obama's reflections from the perspective of a black American was refreshing.Obama can sure talk the talk.
And all this is accurately portrayed in the book.
He's a great looking guy, and no fault to use a ghost writer. And I don't remember his previous book, although I was impressed at the time and voted for him.I think he's acting to America like his father did to him: rejecting, distant, absent, ultimately self-defeating. I always had the feeling there was something wrong with America, some rotten mess at the core of America, some superficial flaw at its heart.
(didn't clean up). And I don't mean the usual liberal breast-beating about racism and other tired subjects. Unfortunately, he's getting a good reaming from his own party, due to the oil spill mess he created.
That's a big subject, but America has turned into a mess, I feel. I don't really fault him on that either, because lawyers don't know how to handle engineering problems. But we need a few practical people in government, and shouldn't have lawyers on the Supreme Court.
I did read this book, but its smooth words did not stick in my head. As the most disliked President in history, I predict he will retire to France.
|
